4.5 Article

Pipeline network design for gathering unconventional oil and gas production using mathematical optimization

Journal

OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 539-589

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-021-09695-z

Keywords

Multiphase; Gathering; Pipeline network; Design; Unconventional oil and gas; Optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The optimal design of gathering networks for unconventional oil and gas production is crucial for improving the economics of unconventional projects. This study proposes a complex multiperiod formulation and an optimization framework to obtain efficient solutions within reasonable computational times, leading to near optimal solutions for real-world instances.
The optimal design of gathering networks for the unconventional oil and gas production is a relevant problem, particularly with the shale boom. In this work, we address a network design problem in which the main decisions are the location and sizing of tank batteries for oil and gas separation together with the pipeline connections. The goal is to gather the oil, gas and water production from a large number of wellpads, being also possible to install junction nodes to merge the production at some points of the field. One major challenge is due to the steep production decline curves, requiring continued connections of new wells. To address this problem, we develop a complex multiperiod formulation accounting for the varying flows over the planning horizon. We propose an optimization framework to obtain efficient solutions within reasonable computational times. To circumvent the computational burden of a large-scale, nonlinear and non-convex model due to the fluid dynamics of multiphase flows, we propose a solution algorithm based on a bi-level decomposition. Near optimal solutions are found for real-world instances, suggesting that facility planning can considerably improve the economics of unconventional projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available