4.6 Article

Frequency response measurement of electro-optic phase modulators using the time-frequency analysis method

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 29, Issue 26, Pages 42599-42606

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.431241

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62105361]
  2. Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China Academy of Space Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel method for measuring the frequency response of electro-optic phase modulators by analyzing the instantaneous frequency of a sinusoidal frequency-modulated signal. The experimental results are supported by a simple theoretical model and the accuracy of half-wave voltage measurement is discussed.
We propose a novel method for the frequency response measurement of electro-optic phase modulators by time-frequency analyzing the instantaneous frequency of a sinusoidal frequency-modulated (SFM) signal. The SFM signal is generated by a frequency-shifting loop (FSL) in which the electro-optic phase modulator under test generates a dual-sideband frequency shift per roundtrip. And the bandwidth of the generated SFM signal is dozens of times of the input radio-frequency (RF), which makes it a precise method to measure the frequency response of electro-optic phase modulators at lower cutoff frequencies. Based on the previously proposed time-delayed interference model [H. Yang et al., J. Lightwave Technol. 39, 3112 (2021)], we establish the relationship between the peak-to-peak frequency of the SFM waveforms and the modulation index of the phase modulators. And a short-time Fourier transformation (STFT) is adopted to characterize the time-frequency properties of output waveforms. Experimental results are well supported by the simple theoretical model. Finally, the accuracy of the half-wave voltage measurement is discussed. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available