4.7 Article

Fuzzy nonlinear regression analysis using a random weight network

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 364, Issue -, Pages 222-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.037

Keywords

alpha-cut set; Fuzzy-in fuzzy-out; Fuzzy nonlinear regression; Random weight network; Triangular fuzzy number

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572361]
  2. Basic Research Project of Knowledge Innovation Program in Shenzhen [JCYJ20150324140036825]
  3. National Natural Science Foundations of China [61503252, 71371063, 61473194, 61473111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modeling a fuzzy-in fuzzy-out system where both inputs and outputs are uncertain is of practical and theoretical importance. Fuzzy nonlinear regression (FNR) is one of the approaches used most widely to model such systems. In this study, we propose the use of a Random Weight Network (RWN) to develop a FNR model called FNRRWN, where both the inputs and outputs are triangular fuzzy numbers. Unlike existing FNR models based on back-propagation (BP) and radial basis function (RBF) networks, FNRRWN does not require iterative adjustment of the network weights and biases. Instead, the input layer weights and hidden layer biases of FNRRWN are selected randomly. The output layer weights for FNRRWN are calculated analytically based on a derived updating rule, which aims to minimize the integrated squared error between alpha-cut sets that correspond to the predicted fuzzy outputs and target fuzzy outputs, respectively. In FNRRWN, the integrated squared error is solved approximately by Riemann integral theory. The experimental results show that the proposed FNRRWN method can effectively approximate a fuzzy-in fuzzy-out system. FNRRWN obtains better prediction accuracy in a lower computational time compared with existing FNR models based on BP and RBF networks. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available