4.6 Article

Responsibility optimization of a high-speed InP/InGaAs photodetector with a back reflector structure

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 4919-4929

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.447596

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61991431]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0209100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an integrated top-illuminated PIN photodetector with a back reflector is developed using an improved microtransfer printing process. The seamless integration of the photodetector with a back reflector optimizes its optical responsibility and bandwidth.
Top-illuminated PIN photodetectors (PDs) are widely utilized in telecommunication systems, and more efforts have been focused on optimizing the optical responsibility and bandwidth for high-speed and capacity applications. In this work, we develop an integrated top-illuminated InP/InGaAs PIN PD with a back reflector by using a microtransfer printing (mu-TP) process. An improved mu-TP process, where the tether of silicon nitride instead of photoresist, is selected to support an underetched III-V device on an InP substrate before transfer. According to theoretical simulations and experimental measurements, the seamless integration of the PD with a back reflector through mu-TP process makes full use of the 2nd or even multiple reflecting light in the absorption layer to optimize the maximum responsibility. The integrated device with a 5 mu m square p-mesa possesses a high optical responsibility of 0.78 A/W and 3 dB bandwidth of 54 GHz using a 500 nm i-InGaAs absorption layer. The present approach for top-illuminated PIN PDs demonstrates an advanced route in which a thin intrinsic layer is available for application in high-performance systems. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available