4.6 Article

Quantitative modeling of near-field interactions incorporating polaritonic and electrostatic effects

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 11619-11632

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.442305

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1848278, DMR-2122044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a finite element model capable of incorporating the complex physical and spatial phenomena in scattering-scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM). The model simulates the multipolar response of the tip and studies the impact of strong coupling on signal demodulation. Additionally, it investigates the electrostatic effect of metallic tips on semiconductors. The model is computationally inexpensive and can be tailored to specific nanostructured systems and geometries of interest.
As scattering-scanning near-field optical microscopy (s-SNOM) continues to grow in prominence, there has been great interest in modeling the near-field light-matter interaction to better predict experimental results. Both analytical and numerical models have been developed to describe the near-field response, but thus far models have not incorporated the full range of phenomena accessible. Here, we present a finite element model (FEM), capable of incorporating the complex physical and spatial phenomena that s-SNOM has proved able to probe. First, we use electromagnetic FEM to simulate the multipolar response of the tip and illustrate the impact of strong coupling on signal demodulation. We then leverage the multiphysics advantage of FEM to study the electrostatic effect of metallic tips on semiconductors, finding that THz s-SNOM studies are most impacted by this tip-induced band-bending. Our model is computationally inexpensive and can be tailored to specific nanostructured systems and geometries of interest. (C) 2022 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available