4.7 Article

Multi-Level Dense Descriptor and Hierarchical Feature Matching for Copy-Move Forgery Detection

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 345, Issue -, Pages 226-242

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.061

Keywords

Copy Move Forgery Detection (CMFD); Multi-Level Dense Descriptor (MLDD); Hierarchical Feature Matching; Color Texture Descriptor; Invariant Moment Descriptor

Funding

  1. Research Committee of the University of Macau [MYRG2015-00011-EST, MYRG2015-00012-FST]
  2. Science and Technology Development Fund of Macau SAR [008/2013/A1, 093-2014-A2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a Multi-Level Dense Descriptor (MLDD) extraction method and a Hierarchical Feature Matching method are proposed to detect copy-move forgery in digital images. The MLDD extraction method extracts the dense feature descriptors using multiple levels, while the extracted dense descriptor consists of two parts: the Color Texture Descriptor and the Invariant Moment Descriptor. After calculating the MLDD for each pixel, the Hierarchical Feature Matching method subsequently detects forgery regions in the input image. First, the pixels that have similar color textures are grouped together into distinctive neighbor pixel sets. Next, each pixel is matched with pixels in its corresponding neighbor pixel set through its geometric invariant moments. Then, the redundant pixels from previously generated matched pixel pairs are filtered out by the proposed Adaptive Distance and Orientation Based Filtering method. Finally, some morphological operations are applied to generate the final detected forgery regions. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme can achieve much better detection results compared with the existing state-of-the-art CMFD methods, even under various challenging conditions such as geometric transforms, JPEG compression, noise addition and down-sampling. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available