4.7 Article

Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages 191-207

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.003

Keywords

Generalized sigmoid function; Asymmetric sigmoid numerical scale (ASNS); Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relation (AHSPR); Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71301141, 71561026, 71571123, 61273209]
  2. Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [13YJC630247]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study considers the practical phenomena in the process of preference elicitation and proposes an asymmetric sigmoid numerical scale (ASNS) based on a generalized sigmoid function. It also offers proof of the scale's asymmetry, variability, consistency, and diminishing utility properties. Further, this study introduces the hesitant fuzzy preference format and defines the hesitant fuzzy continuous preference term. Based on this approach, the asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relation (AHSPR) is developed and used in the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results show that the AHSPR is a general and optimal preference relation. Additionally, this study constructs a discrete fitting technology and an approximate translation method as the applied bases of the new scale and the preference relation. Following this, a model framework of the AHSPR in the AHP is provided. Finally, this study re-examines a well-known numerical example in order to demonstrate the application and advantages of the proposed numerical scale, the preference format, and the modeling framework. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available