Journal
ONCOLOGIST
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 228-235Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab058
Keywords
myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib; burden; costs; health care resource utilization
Categories
Funding
- Bristol Myers Squibb
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Myelofibrosis results in increased resource utilization and costs for patients and the US healthcare system. This study provides insights into treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs associated with myelofibrosis, particularly in patients treated with ruxolitinib.
Myelofibrosis leads to significant resource utilization and costs for patients and the US health care system. This article describes treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs associated with myelofibrosis and in a subgroup of patients who were treated with ruxolitinib. Background This study analyses treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and a subgroup treated with ruxolitinib (RUX). Materials and Methods Treatment patterns, all-cause and MF-related HCRU, and costs were analyzed in adults with MF with continuous enrollment in a commercial or the Medicare Advantage health plan in the pre-index period, defined as the 12 months immediately prior to the index date (date of primary or secondary MF diagnosis), and the post-index period, defined as >= 6 months following the index date. In a subgroup analysis, outcomes were analyzed in patients treated with optimal RUX (OPT RUX, >= 30 mg) and suboptimal RUX (SUB RUX, <30 mg) in the pre-index RUX period, defined as the 3 months immediately prior to the index RUX date (first date for an RUX claim), and the post-index RUX period, defined as >= 6 months following the index RUX date. Results Of 2830 patients with an MF diagnosis, 1191 met eligibility requirements. The median age of patients was 72 years, 54% were male, and comorbidities were frequent. Sixty percent of patients received >= 1 line of therapy (LOT), of which 46% (n = 331) had >= 2 LOTs during the post-index MF period. Costs increased considerably 6-month pre-index to 6-month post-index (all-cause: cause ($24,216 to $48,966) and MF-related ($16,502 to $39,383), driven by inpatient stays and pharmacy costs. In the subgroup analysis, patients treated with RUX (n = 495) experienced significant disease burden and high costs, regardless of dose. A shorter duration of therapy and a higher rate of discontinuation were observed in patients treated with SUB RUX (n = 191) versus OPT RUX (n = 304). Conclusion These findings suggest a significant disease and economic impacts associated with MF patients that persists with RUX therapy, highlighting the need for additional therapeutic options for MF.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available