Journal
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 79, Issue 5, Pages 315-318Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107805
Keywords
COVID-19; firefighters
Categories
Funding
- Rockefeller Foundation [2020 HTH 032]
- Conrad N. Hilton Foundation [26318]
- Abbott Diagnostics
- Burns and Allen Research Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre
- Office of Mayor Eric Garcetti, City of Los Angeles [C-137679]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study estimated the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among firefighters in the Los Angeles Fire Department in October 2020 and compared demographic and contextual factors for seropositivity. The seroprevalence among firefighters was 8.8%, and there was no association between seropositivity and gender, age, or race/ethnicity. Firefighters who reported working near the LA International Airport had the highest seropositivity rate.
Objective We estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among a sample of firefighters in the Los Angeles (LA), California fire department in October 2020 and compare demographic and contextual factors for seropositivity. Methods We conducted a serological survey of firefighters in LA, California, USA, in October 2020. Individuals were classified as seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 if they tested positive for IgG, IgM or both. We compared demographic and contextual factors for seropositivity. Results All firefighters in LA, California, USA were invited to participate in our study, but only roughly 21% participated. Of 713 participants with valid serological data, 8.8% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and among the 686 with complete survey data 8.9% tested positive for antibodies. Seropositivity was not associated with gender, age or race/ethnicity. Seropositivity was highest among firefighters who reported working in the vicinity of LA International Airport, which had a known outbreak in July 2020. Conclusions Seroprevalence among firefighters in our sample was 8.8%, however, we lack a full workplace seroprevalence estimate to compare the relative magnitude against general population seroprevalence (15%). Workplace safety protocols, such as access to personal protective equipment and testing, can mitigate increased risk of infection at work, and may have eliminated differences in disease burden by geography and race/ethnicity in our sample.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available