4.4 Review

Evaluation of Metabolic Outcomes Following SADI-S: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 1049-1063

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05824-w

Keywords

SADI-S; Bariatric surgery; Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy; Duodenal switch; RYGB

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) and compares them with other malabsorptive procedures. The results show that SADI-S leads to improved metabolic and weight loss outcomes with lower perioperative risks. However, long-term outcomes are needed to guide future adoption.
Purpose Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) offers a novel bariatric procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates observational and comparative studies evaluating SADI-S, with meta-analysis comparing outcomes to other malabsorptive procedures (MPs). Materials and Methods Systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in March 2021. The study followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating SADI-S with n > 5 were included. Primary outcome was diabetes (DM) remission, and secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes, comorbidity resolution, and weight loss. Results We reviewed 2285 studies with 16 included evaluating 3319 patients and 1704 (51.3%) undergoing SADI-S. SADI-S patients had increased BMI (49.6 kg/m(2) vs 48.8 kg/m(2)) and weight (139.7 kg vs 137.1 kg), were more likely to have DM (46.3% vs 42.1%), and dyslipidemia (36.6% SADI-S vs 32.7%). SADI-S had a shorter operative duration than MPs (MD - 36.74, p < 0.001), 0.85-day shorter post-operative stay (p < 0.001), and trended towards fewer complications (OR 0.69, p = 0.06). Rate of reoperation (OR 0.83, p = 0.59) was similar and DM remission was similar (OR 0.07, p = 0.1). Subgroup analysis suggested greater DM remission than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (OR 4.42, p = 0.04). SADI-S had fewer malabsorptive complications, though follow-up was shorter. Weight loss was 37.3% compared to 35.6% total weight loss after SADI-S and MPs, respectively. Conclusion SADI-S demonstrates improved metabolic and weight loss outcomes with lower perioperative risks. SADI-S represents a promising bariatric procedure but long-term outcomes are needed to guide future uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available