4.7 Article

Concentric network symmetry

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 333, Issue -, Pages 61-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.11.014

Keywords

Symmetry; Complex networks; Concentric; Measurements

Funding

  1. FAPESP [11/22639-8, 2012/22160-7, 2011/50761-2, 2013/26416-9, 11/50761-2]
  2. CNPq [305940/2010-4, 307333/2013-2]
  3. NAP eScience - PRP - USP
  4. NAP-PRP-USP
  5. FAPESP/York [12/50986-7]
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/22639-8, 11/50761-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantification of symmetries in complex networks is typically done globally in terms of automorphisms. Extending previous methods to locally assess the symmetry of nodes is not straightforward. Here we present a new framework to quantify the symmetries around nodes, which we call connectivity patterns. We develop two topological transformations that allow a concise characterization of the different types of symmetry appearing on networks and apply these concepts to six network models, namely the Erdos-Renyi, Barabasi-Albert, random geometric graph, Waxman, Voronoi and rewired Voronoi. Real-world networks, namely the scientific areas of Wikipedia, the world-wide airport network and the street networks of Oldenburg and San Joaquin, are also analyzed in terms of the proposed symmetry measurements. Several interesting results emerge from this analysis, including the high symmetry exhibited by the Erdos-Renyi model. Additionally, we found that the proposed measurements present low correlation with other traditional metrics, such as node degree and betweenness centrality. Principal component analysis is used to combine all the results, revealing that the concepts presented here have substantial potential to also characterize networks at a global scale. We also provide a real-world application to the financial market network. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available