4.3 Article

A Transformative Learning Experience for Senior Nursing Students

Journal

NURSE EDUCATOR
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 161-167

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001141

Keywords

nursing student; prelicensure program; reflection; transformative learning theory; writing assignment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article describes the use of critical reflection on experiences in an undergraduate senior mentorship course to assess student learning. The findings indicate that through critical reflection, students were able to recognize the learning opportunities provided by mentorship, despite the limitations and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background: Research suggests that clinical practicums in hospital-based settings are important, even if condensed, to provide students with the opportunity for real-world learning experiences. Rational dialogue makes learning meaningful and empowers students to learn by reflecting on experiences. Problem: The COVID-19 pandemic minimized availability of traditional one-to-one mentorship practicums. Approach: This article describes the use of critical reflection on experiences in an undergraduate senior mentorship course to assess student learning through the thematic analysis of writing assignments. Guided by Mezirow's transformative learning theory, students completed a traditional group clinical practice, written reflective journals and virtual seminars focused on role development, and reflection on concurrent learning in clinical and simulation experiences. Outcomes: Transformative learning was evident in their writing. Student journals demonstrated themes of responding to change, discovering resilience, developing confidence, finding gratitude, embracing advocacy, and transforming and becoming. Conclusions: Through critical reflection, students recognized the opportunities mentorship afforded them, despite challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available