4.8 Article

DNA methylation variation along the cancer epigenome and the identification of novel epigenetic driver events

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 49, Issue 22, Pages 12692-12705

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab1167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondazione AIRC [MFAG 21791]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While large-scale studies have identified hundreds of mutated driver genes in various cancer types, the contribution of epigenetic changes to cancer remains unclear. A novel method correcting for epigenetic covariates reveals a concise set of potential epigenetic driver events, indicating higher convergence on common tumor suppressor pathways and higher tolerance of other aberrations in prostate cancer.
While large-scale studies applying various statistical approaches have identified hundreds of mutated driver genes across various cancer types, the contribution of epigenetic changes to cancer remains more enigmatic. This is partly due to the fact that certain regions of the cancer genome, due to their genomic and epigenomic properties, are more prone to dysregulated DNA methylation than others. Thus, it has been difficult to distinguish which promoter methylation changes are really driving carcinogenesis from those that are mostly just a reflection of their genomic location. By developing a novel method that corrects for epigenetic covariates, we reveal a small, concise set of potential epigenetic driver events. Interestingly, those changes suggest different modes of epigenetic carcinogenesis: first, we observe recurrent inactivation of known cancer genes across tumour types suggesting a higher convergence on common tumour suppressor pathways than previously anticipated. Second, in prostate cancer, a cancer type with few recurrently mutated genes, we demonstrate how the epigenome primes tumours towards higher tolerance of other aberrations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available