4.2 Article

The subtraction contribution to the muonic-hydrogen Lamb shift: A point for lattice QCD calculations of the polarizability effect

Journal

NUCLEAR PHYSICS A
Volume 1016, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122323

Keywords

Muonic hydrogen; Lamb shift; Subtraction function; Structure functions; Two-photon exchange; Dispersion relations

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the Ambizione Grant [PZ00P2_193383]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [204404729 SFB 1044]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_193383] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proton-polarizability contribution to the muonic-hydrogen Lamb shift is a major source of theoretical uncertainty in the extraction of the proton charge radius. A different subtraction point is considered to access the subtraction function directly in lattice calculations, with the whole effect dominated by the subtraction contribution, calculable on the lattice.
The proton-polarizability contribution to the muonic-hydrogen Lamb shift is a major source of theoretical uncertainty in the extraction of the proton charge radius. An empirical evaluation of this effect, based on the proton structure functions, requires a systematically improvable calculation of the subtraction function, possibly using lattice QCD. We consider a different subtraction point, with the aim of accessing the subtraction function directly in lattice calculations. A useful feature of this subtraction point is that the corresponding contribution of the structure functions to the Lamb shift is suppressed. The whole effect is dominated by the subtraction contribution, calculable on the lattice. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available