4.5 Article

Influence of aspect ratio, plasma viscosity, and radial position of the resonant surfaces on the plasmoid formation in the low resistivity plasma in Tokamak

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac46f8

Keywords

sawtooth; incomplete reconnection; plasmoid; secondary tearing instability

Funding

  1. National MCF Energy RD Program [2019YFE03090500, 2019YFE03030004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12005185, 11775188, 11835010]
  3. Fundamental Research Fund for Chinese Central Universities [2021FZZX003-03-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we systematically investigate the nonlinear evolution of the resistive kink mode in the low resistivity plasma in Tokamak geometry. We find that the aspect ratio of the initial equilibrium can significantly influence the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation. Additionally, the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation decreases with increasing plasma viscosity in the moderately low resistivity regime. The geometry of Tokamaks also affects the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation.
In the present paper, we systematically investigate the nonlinear evolution of the resistive kink mode in the low resistivity plasma in Tokamak geometry. We find that the aspect ratio of the initial equilibrium can significantly influence the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation. With the aspect ratio of 3/1, the critical resistivity can be one magnitude larger than that in cylindrical geometry due to the strong mode-mode coupling. We also find that the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation eta (crit) decreases with increasing plasma viscosity in the moderately low resistivity regime. Due to the geometry of Tokamaks, the critical resistivity for plasmoid formation increases with the increasing radial location of the resonant surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available