4.5 Article

Linear gyrokinetic stability of a high β non-inductive spherical tokamak

Journal

NUCLEAR FUSION
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac359c

Keywords

gyrokinetics; spherical tokamak; electromagnetic; turbulence; kinetic ballooning mode; micro tearing mode; high beta

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L01663X/1, EP/R034737/1, EP/T012250/1]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. EPSRC [EP/R034737/1, EP/T012250/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed a spherical tokamak plasma equilibrium with a power of 1 GW and identified the dominant micro-instabilities that may occur. A marginally stable state was found at θ(0) = 0.0. This research is important for understanding turbulent transport in high beta STs.
Spherical tokamaks (STs) have been shown to possess properties desirable for a fusion power plant such as achieving high plasma beta and having increased vertical stability. To understand the confinement properties that might be expected in the conceptual design for a high beta ST fusion reactor, a 1 GW ST plasma equilibrium was analysed using local linear gyrokinetics to determine the type of micro-instabilities that arise. Kinetic ballooning modes and micro-tearing modes are found to be the dominant instabilities. The parametric dependence of these linear modes was determined and, from the insights gained, the equilibrium was tuned to find a regime marginally stable to all micro-instabilities at theta(0) = 0.0. This work identifies the most important micro-instabilities expected to generate turbulent transport in high beta STs. The impact of such modes must be faithfully captured in first-principles-based reduced models of anomalous transport that are needed for predictive simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available