3.9 Article

Species-specific relationship between angler catch and satisfaction among anglers targeting salmonid fishes in Hokkaido lakes, Japan

Journal

NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages 461-472

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC FISHERIES SCIENCE
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.21-00007

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there is a close relationship between angler satisfaction and fish catch, with different types of anglers having different demands for different target species. Therefore, when formulating management strategies for fish resources, it is important to consider anglers' orientations and their needs for catch.
Recreational angling is a dominant use of inland fish resources. Since recreational angling is a leisure-based activity, the stock manager must meet two objectives: 1) maintain fish stocks, and 2) maximize angler satisfaction with limited catch. To achieve these goals, it is important to evaluate the relationship between angler satisfaction and catch in order to construct a management strategy, because catch is one of the most important connections between fish stock and angler satisfaction. In this study, the relationships of four angling target species which have different biological and social traits were investigated. The results of a questionnaire survey of 639 anglers in total revealed four types of orientation: 1) the catch of endemic target fish strongly enhances angler satisfaction, 2) the existence of endemic fish increases angler satisfaction for all anglers, 3) fish size has a greater influence than number of fish for anglers who target fish that grow larger (i.e. trophy anglers), and 4) anglers desire more fish when the target fish has higher value as a food (i.e. consumption orientation). For the sustainable use of fish stocks for recreational angling, not only the biological traits of stocks but also anglers' orientation toward catch should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available