4.8 Article

Live Birth with or without Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 385, Issue 22, Pages 2047-2058

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103613

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this randomized, controlled trial comparing PGT-A with conventional IVF in women with three or more good-quality blastocysts, it was found that the cumulative live-birth rate with conventional IVF was noninferior to that with PGT-A.
Background Embryo selection with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) may improve pregnancy outcomes after initial embryo transfer. However, it remains uncertain whether PGT-A improves the cumulative live-birth rate as compared with conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned subfertile women with three or more good-quality blastocysts to undergo either PGT-A or conventional IVF; all the women were between 20 and 37 years of age. Three blastocysts were screened by next-generation sequencing in the PGT-A group or were chosen by morphologic criteria in the conventional-IVF group and then were successively transferred one by one. The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after up to three embryo-transfer procedures within 1 year after randomization. We hypothesized that the use of PGT-A would result in a cumulative live-birth rate that was no more than 7 percentage points higher than the rate after conventional IVF, which would constitute the noninferiority margin for conventional IVF as compared with PGT-A. Results A total of 1212 patients underwent randomization, and 606 were assigned to each trial group. Live births occurred in 468 women (77.2%) in the PGT-A group and in 496 (81.8%) in the conventional-IVF group (absolute difference, -4.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.2 to -0.0; P<0.001). The cumulative frequency of clinical pregnancy loss was 8.7% and 12.6%, respectively (absolute difference, -3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.5 to -0.2). The incidences of obstetrical or neonatal complications and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Among women with three or more good-quality blastocysts, conventional IVF resulted in a cumulative live-birth rate that was noninferior to the rate with PGT-A. (Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, .) Live Birth after Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) with conventional IVF in women with a good prognosis, the conventional-IVF group had a cumulative live-birth rate that was noninferior to that after PGT-A at 1 year.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available