4.7 Article

Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 7, Pages 1339-1349

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yale University Department of Psychiatry
  2. Connecticut Mental Health Center (CMHC)
  3. Connecticut State Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS)
  4. [R01 DA043690]
  5. [R21MH116258]
  6. [R01MH12887]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a multi-level kernel-based density meta-analysis to explore prediction error signals in the midbrain and insula during reward, punishment, action, cognition, and perception tasks. The findings demonstrated the existence of domain-specific error signals and provided valuable insight into cognitive functions and dysfunctions in humans and other animals.
Prediction errors (PEs) are a keystone for computational neuroscience. Their association with midbrain neural firing has been confirmed across species and has inspired the construction of artificial intelligence that can outperform humans. However, there is still much to learn. Here, we leverage the wealth of human PE data acquired in the functional neuroimaging setting in service of a deeper understanding, using an MKDA (multi-level kernel-based density) meta-analysis. Studies were identified with Google Scholar, and we included studies with healthy adult participants that reported activation coordinates corresponding to PEs published between 1999-2018. Across 264 PE studies that have focused on reward, punishment, action, cognition, and perception, consistent with domain-general theoretical models of prediction error we found midbrain PE signals during cognitive and reward learning tasks, and an insula PE signal for perceptual, social, cognitive, and reward prediction errors. There was evidence for domain-specific error signals--in the visual hierarchy during visual perception, and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex during social inference. We assessed bias following prior neuroimaging meta-analyses and used family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons. This organization of computation by region will be invaluable in building and testing mechanistic models of cognitive function and dysfunction in machines, humans, and other animals. Limitations include small sample sizes and ROI masking in some included studies, which we addressed by weighting each study by sample size, and directly comparing whole brain vs. ROI-based results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available