4.5 Review

Driving and Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review of the existing guidelines emphasizing on the neurologist's role

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 4953-4963

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05610-7

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Neuropsychology; Cognitive disorders and dementia; Driving guidelines; Neurologists

Funding

  1. Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation [G ZN 060-1/2017-2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Driving is a complex task that requires the integrity and cooperation of cognition, motor, and somatosensory skills, all impacted by neurological diseases. Neurologists play a critical role in assessing the fitness to drive of cognitively impaired individuals. Research indicates that, despite numerous guidelines and recommendations, there is still no widely accepted approach for evaluating the driving ability of cognitively impaired individuals.
Background Driving is a complex task requiring the integrity and the cooperation of cognition, motor, and somatosensory skills, all of which are impacted by neurological diseases. Objective Identification of neurologist's role when assessing fitness to drive of cognitively impaired individuals. Methods We performed a systematic review of the guidelines/recommendations (G/Rs) regarding the evaluation of driving fitness of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia. Emphasis was put on the neurological and neuropsychological aspects of the evaluation. Results Eighteen G/Rs were included in the review (9 national guidelines, 5 recommendation papers, 3 consensus statements, and 1 position paper). All G/Rs referred to drivers with dementia and 9/18 referred to drivers with MCI. A common approach among G/Rs is the initial trichotomization of patients in safe to drive, unsafe to drive, and undetermined cases, which are referred to a second-line evaluator. First-line evaluators are general practitioners in 10/18 G/Rs; second-line evaluators are neurologists in 7/18 G/Rs. Specific neuropsychological tests are proposed in 11/18 G/Rs and relative cut-off values in 7/18. The most commonly used tests are the MMSE, TMT, and CDT. A thorough neurological examination is proposed in only 1/18 G/R. Conclusion Although extensive multi-disciplinary research has provided useful information for driving behavior of cognitively impaired individuals, we are still far from a widely accepted approach of driving ability evaluation in this increasing population. A comprehensive assessment from a multi-disciplinary team in which the neurologist plays a critical role seems to be required, although this has not yet been implemented in any G/Rs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available