4.7 Article

Deep learning identifies brain structures that predict cognition and explain heterogeneity in cognitive aging

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119020

Keywords

Cognitive heterogeneity; Brain reserve; Deep learning; Cognitive aging

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CNS-1337732, CNS-1624790]
  2. NIH [U01 AG006786, R01 NS097495, R01 AG056366, P50 AG016574, R37 AG011378, R01 AG041851, R01 AG034676]
  3. Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation
  4. Mayo/Illinois Alliance Fellowships for Technology-Based Healthcare Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using deep learning models and interpretation techniques, we identified brain structures that were most predictive of cognitive trajectories and indicative of cognitive resilience or vulnerability. Medial temporal lobe, fornix, and corpus callosum were the most predictive structures.
Specific brain structures (gray matter regions and white matter tracts) play a dominant role in determining cognitive decline and explain the heterogeneity in cognitive aging. Identification of these structures is crucial for screening of older adults at risk of cognitive decline. Using deep learning models augmented with a model interpretation technique on data from 1432 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants, we identified a subset of brain structures that were most predictive of individualized cognitive trajectories and indicative of cognitively resilient vs. vulnerable individuals. Specifically, these structures explained why some participants were resilient to the deleterious effects of elevated brain amyloid and poor vascular health. Of these, medial temporal lobe and fornix, reflective of age and pathology-related degeneration, and corpus callosum, reflective of inter-hemispheric disconnection, accounted for 60% of the heterogeneity explained by the most predictive structures. Our results are valuable for identifying cognitively vulnerable individuals and for developing interventions for cognitive decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available