4.4 Review

Post-operative anorectal manometry in children with Hirschsprung disease: A systematic review

Journal

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14311

Keywords

anorectum; gastrointestinal motility; high-resolution manometry; Hirschsprung disease; manometry

Funding

  1. Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The systematic review focused on post-operative anorectal manometry in children with Hirschsprung disease, revealing a lack of high-quality evidence and consistency in reported outcomes. Standardization of protocols, cohort reporting, and outcome assessments are essential for future research in this area.
Background Hirschsprung disease is commonly encountered by pediatric surgeons. Despite advances in the surgical management, these children may experience symptoms of bowel dysfunction throughout adulthood. Anorectal manometry may be used to assess post-operative anorectal structure and function. This review aimed to consolidate and evaluate the literature pertaining to post-operative findings of anorectal manometry in children with Hirschsprung disease. Purpose (1) Synthesize the available data regarding anorectal motility patterns in children following repair of Hirschsprung disease. (2) Evaluate the reported anorectal manometry protocols. Data Sources We performed a systematic review of four databases: Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PubMed. Study Selection This systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies reporting results of post-operative anorectal manometry in children with Hirschsprung disease were evaluated for inclusion. Results Twenty-three studies satisfied inclusion criteria, with a combined cohort of 939 patients. Post-operative anorectal manometry results were reported for 682 children. The majority of included studies were assessed as poor quality. Disparate manometry protocols, heterogeneous cohorts, and lack of standardized outcome assessments introduced a risk of outcome reporting bias, limited the comparability of results, and impeded clinical translation of findings. Conclusions This systematic review demonstrated the lack of high-quality evidence underlying the current understanding of post-operative anorectal motility in children with HD. There was little consistency in reported manometry outcomes between studies. In future work, emphasis must be placed on the application of standardized manometry protocols, cohort reporting, and patient outcome assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available