4.6 Article

Learning edge-preserved image stitching from multi-scale deep homography

Journal

NEUROCOMPUTING
Volume 491, Issue -, Pages 533-543

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.12.032

Keywords

Image stitching; Homography estimation; Deep learning; Computer vision

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62172032, 61772066, 61972028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an image stitching learning framework that utilizes a multi-scale deep homography module and an edge-preserved deformation module to achieve accurate homography estimation and artifact elimination in image stitching.
Image stitching is a classical and challenging technique in computer vision, which aims to generate an image with a wide field of view. The traditional methods heavily depend on feature detection and require the feature points to be dense and evenly distributed in the image, leading to poor robustness in low-texture scenes. Learning methods are rarely studied due to the unavailability of ground truth stitched results, showing unreliable performance on real-world datasets. In this paper, we propose an image stitching learning framework, which consists of a multi-scale deep homography module and an edgepreserved deformation module. First, we design a multi-scale deep homography module to estimate the accurate homography progressively from coarse to fine. After that, an edge-preserved deformation module is designed to learn the deformation rules of image stitching from edge to content, generating the stitched image with artifacts eliminated. Besides, the proposed supervised learning framework can stitch images of arbitrary resolutions and demonstrate good generalization capability in real-world images. Experiments show that our superiority to the existing homography solutions and image stitching algorithms. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available