4.5 Article

Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 1881-1886

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000860

Keywords

budesonide foam; corticosteroid; ulcerative proctitis; ulcerative proctosigmoiditis; 5-aminosalicylic acid

Funding

  1. Salix Pharmaceuticals
  2. Abbott
  3. ActoGeniX NV
  4. AGI Therapeutics Inc.
  5. Alba Therapeutics Corporation
  6. Albireo
  7. Alfa Wassermann
  8. Amgen
  9. AM-Pharma BV
  10. Anaphore, Inc.
  11. Astellas
  12. Athersys, Inc.
  13. Atlantic Healthcare Ltd.
  14. Aptalis
  15. BioBalance Corp.
  16. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  17. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  18. Celgene
  19. Celek Pharmaceuticals
  20. Cellerix SL
  21. Cerimon Pharmaceuticals
  22. ChemoCentryx
  23. CoMentis, Inc.
  24. Cosmo Technologies
  25. Coronado Biosciences
  26. Cytokine Pharmasciences
  27. Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  28. EnGene, Inc.
  29. Eli Lilly
  30. EnteroMedics, Inc.
  31. Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
  32. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  33. Flexion Therapeutics, Inc.
  34. Funxional Therapeutics Ltd.
  35. Genzyme Corp.
  36. Gilead Sciences
  37. Given Imaging
  38. GlaxoSmithKline
  39. Human Genome Sciences
  40. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  41. Janssen Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC
  42. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals
  43. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
  44. Lycera Corp.
  45. Meda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  46. Merck Research Laboratories
  47. Merck Serono
  48. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  49. Nisshin Kyorin Pharmaceuticals
  50. Novo Nordisk
  51. NPS Pharmaceuticals
  52. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  53. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.
  54. PDL Biopharma, Inc.
  55. Pfizer
  56. Procter and Gamble
  57. Prometheus Laboratories
  58. ProtAb Ltd.
  59. Purgenesis Technologies, Inc.
  60. Relypsa, Inc.
  61. Roche
  62. Salient Pharmaceuticals
  63. Santarus, Inc.
  64. Schering Plough
  65. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  66. Sigmoid Pharma Ltd.
  67. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  68. SLA Pharma UK Ltd
  69. Targacept, Inc.
  70. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  71. Therakos, Inc.
  72. Tilliotts Pharma AG
  73. TxCell SA
  74. UCB Pharma
  75. Viamet Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  76. Vascular Biogenics Ltd.
  77. Warner Chilcott UK Ltd.
  78. Wyeth
  79. Abbott Laboratories
  80. Genentech
  81. Novartis
  82. AbbVie
  83. Amgen Genentech
  84. Janssen
  85. Shire
  86. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  87. UCB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background:Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis.Methods:Patients received budesonide foam 2 mg/25 mL twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks, or placebo, with or without continued stable dosing of baseline oral 5-ASAs, for remission induction at week 6 (primary endpoint) in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies.Results:Of the 267 and 279 patients randomized to treatment with budesonide foam or placebo (pooled population), 55.1% and 55.2%, respectively, reported baseline 5-ASA use. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved remission with budesonide foam versus placebo, either with (42.2% versus 31.8%, respectively; P = 0.03) or without (40.0% versus 14.4%; P < 0.0001) baseline 5-ASA use at week 6. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved a Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index rectal bleeding subscale score of 0 at week 6, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use (5-ASA, 50.3% versus 35.7%; P = 0.003: no 5-ASA, 45.8% versus 19.2%; P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use.Conclusions:Budesonide foam was efficacious and safe for induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in patients receiving oral 5-ASA at baseline and those who were not (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01008410 and NCT01008423).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available