4.5 Article

Change in the second exteroceptive suppression period of the temporalis muscle during erenumab treatment

Journal

NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 395, Issue 5, Pages 607-611

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-022-02216-4

Keywords

Migraine; Monoclonal antibodies; Exteroceptive suppression reflex; ES2; Clinical neurophysiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This pilot study found a statistically significant decrease in ES2 latency and duration of the temporalis muscle activity after erenumab treatment in chronic female migraineurs. This suggests that ES2 may serve as a neurophysiological marker in migraine pathophysiology and that the monoclonal antibody can modulate brainstem circuits involved in migraine pathophysiology indirectly. Further research is needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Comparative studies on the second exteroceptive suppression period (ES2) of the masseter or temporalis muscle in migraineurs and controls have provided conflicting results. As the interneurons responsible for ES2 are probably close to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and receive afferents also from the anti-nociceptive system, the study of ES2 could provide information on neural circuits involved in migraine pathophysiology. The aim of this observational, pilot study was to assess whether erenumab treatment may affect the exteroceptive suppression reflex of the temporalis muscle activity in migraineurs. The exteroceptive suppression reflex of the temporalis muscle activity was previously studied in a small case series of three chronic female migraineurs and after 4 months of beneficial erenumab treatment, administered according to current clinical indications. There was a statistically significant decrease in ES2 latency (p-value 0.039) and duration (p-value 0.030) after treatment. The change observed in the temporalis ES2 during erenumab treatment indicates that ES2 may play some kind of role as a neurophysiological marker and that this monoclonal antibody can modulate the brainstem circuits involved in migraine pathophysiology, at least indirectly. Further studies are required to confirm this intriguing hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available