The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view

In oncology, a definition of drug value that patients, payers, regulators and clinicians agree upon on does not exist. The authors of this Perspective discuss different approaches to measuring value, such as assessments of benefit-risk balance and cost-effectiveness, individual attitudes to risk, and use of scales developed to measure value objectively. They also explain how regulators can help to inform different decision makers. The high prices of new anticancer drugs and the marginal added benefit perceived by some stakeholders have fuelled a debate on the value of anticancer drugs in the European Union, even though an agreed definition of what constitutes a drug's value does not exist. In this Perspective, we discuss the value of drugs from different viewpoints and objectives of decision makers: for regulators, assessment of the benefit-risk balance of a drug is a cornerstone for approval; payers rely on cost-effectiveness analyses carried out by health technology assessment agencies for reimbursement decisions; for patients, treatment choices are based on personal preferences and attitudes to risk; and clinicians can use several scales (such as the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS)) that have been developed as an attempt to measure value objectively. Although a unique definition that fully captures the concept of value is unlikely to emerge, herein we discuss the importance of understanding different perspectives, and how regulators can help to inform different decision makers.

Automated summary

This paper discusses the understanding and measurement of drug value in oncology from the perspectives of different decision makers, including regulators, payers, patients, and clinicians. Although a unique definition capturing the concept of value is unlikely to emerge, the importance of understanding different viewpoints and how regulators can help inform different decision makers is discussed.