4.8 Article

Classical non-Abelian braiding of acoustic modes

Journal

NATURE PHYSICS
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 179-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01431-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [12302420, 12300419, 22302718, C6013-18G, AoE/P-02/12, 16303119]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11922416, 11802256]
  3. Hong Kong Baptist University [RC-SGT2/18-19/SCI/006]
  4. Croucher Foundation [CAS20SC01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the realization of non-Abelian braiding of multiple degenerate acoustic waveguide modes, exploring the dynamics and geometric phase variations. By switching the order of different braiding processes, the non-Abelian characteristics are revealed.
Non-Abelian braiding is regarded as an essential process for realizing quantum logic. Its realizations in quantum systems often rely on the dynamic winding of anyons, which can be challenging to obtain. Implementing braiding in a classical system could, therefore, assist the experimental study of non-Abelian physics. Here we present the realization of the non-Abelian braiding of multiple degenerate acoustic waveguide modes. The dynamics of non-Abelian braiding can be captured by the non-Abelian Berry-Wilczek-Zee phase that connects the holonomic adiabatic evolutions of multiple degenerate states. The cyclic evolution of degenerate states induces a non-Abelian geometric phase, manifesting as the exchange of states. The non-Abelian characteristics are revealed by switching the order of two distinct braiding processes involving three modes. Our work demonstrates wave manipulations based on non-Abelian braiding and logic operations. Although it shows promise for applications, non-Abelian braiding is difficult to realize in electronic systems. Its demonstration using acoustic waveguides may provide a useful platform to study non-Abelian physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available