Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
Wouter Bulten et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2021)
Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study
Ohad Kott et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS (2021)
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study
Peter Strom et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study
Wouter Bulten et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2020)
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
Geert J. L. H. van Leenders et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2020)
Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies
Myura Nagendran et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens
Kunal Nagpal et al.
JAMA ONCOLOGY (2020)
Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens
Wenchao Han et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)
Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies
David F. Steiner et al.
JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2020)
From Detection of Individual Metastases to Classification of Lymph Node Status at the Patient Level: The CAMELYON17 Challenge
Peter Bandi et al.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING (2019)
Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019
James L. Mohler et al.
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK (2019)
A new era: artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate cancer
S. Larry Goldenberg et al.
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2019)
Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence
Christopher J. Kelly et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2019)
Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 Data Science Bowl
Juan C. Caicedo et al.
NATURE METHODS (2019)
No pixel-level annotations needed
Jeroen van der Laak et al.
NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (2019)
Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety
Robert Challen et al.
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2019)
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images
Guy Nir et al.
JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2019)
Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
Kunal Nagpal et al.
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE (2019)
AI diagnostics need attention Computer algorithms to detect disease show great promise, but they must be developed and applied with care
[Anonymous]
NATURE (2018)
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Milena A. Gianfrancesco et al.
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2018)
Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity
Alvin Rajkomar et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2018)
Why rankings of biomedical image analysis competitions should be interpreted with care
Lena Maier-Hein et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2018)
Deep learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: Current applications and future directions
Koichiro Yasaka et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2018)
Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer
Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2017)
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Geert Litjens et al.
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS (2017)
Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute
Gregory M. Kurtzer et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
Jonathan I. Epstein et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer
Tayyar A. Ozkan et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system
Phillip M. Pierorazio et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2013)
Standardization of Gleason grading among 337 European pathologists
Lars Egevad et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2013)
An Update of the Gleason Grading System
Jonathan I. Epstein
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2010)
A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsies
J Melia et al.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (2006)
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: Urologic pathologists
WC Allsbrook et al.
HUMAN PATHOLOGY (2001)
Share Paper
