4.8 Review

Biochar in climate change mitigation

Journal

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 883-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00852-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
  2. EU FEDER [RTI2018-099417-B-I00]
  3. Fondation des Fondateurs
  4. NIFA [2014-67003-22069]
  5. US DOE [DE-SC0020351]
  6. CIDA
  7. Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020351] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  9. NIFA [2014-67003-22069, 688228] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change mitigation strategies based on biochar generation and its application to agricultural soils can effectively sequester carbon, with trade-offs between biogeochemical and economic considerations. Emission reductions and CO2 removal by biochar systems depend on the energy being replaced, with varying impacts when biochar is used instead of coal or renewable energy sources. Opportunities for increasing crop yields exist with biochar additions, but the trade-offs and relationships among emissions reductions, energy production, and fertilizer responses must be carefully considered for effective climate change mitigation.
Climate change mitigation strategies based on biochar generation-and its application to agricultural soils-can effectively sequester carbon, although biogeochemical and economic trade-offs must be considered. Climate change mitigation not only requires reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, but also withdrawal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Here we review the relationship between emissions reductions and CO2 removal by biochar systems, which are based on pyrolysing biomass to produce biochar, used for soil application, and renewable bioenergy. Half of the emission reductions and the majority of CO2 removal result from the one to two orders of magnitude longer persistence of biochar than the biomass it is made from. Globally, biochar systems could deliver emission reductions of 3.4-6.3 PgCO(2)e, half of which constitutes CO2 removal. Relevant trade-offs exist between making and sequestering biochar in soil or producing more energy. Importantly, these trade-offs depend on what type of energy is replaced: relative to producing bioenergy, emissions of biochar systems increase by 3% when biochar replaces coal, whereas emissions decrease by 95% when biochar replaces renewable energy. The lack of a clear relationship between crop yield increases in response to fertilizer and to biochar additions suggests opportunities for biochar to increase crop yields where fertilizer alone is not effective, but also questions blanket recommendations based on known fertilizer responses. Locally specific decision support must recognize these relationships and trade-offs to establish carbon-trading mechanisms that facilitate a judicious implementation commensurate with climate change mitigation needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available