4.8 Article

Genome-wide association analyses highlight etiological differences underlying newly defined subtypes of diabetes

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00948-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2017-02688, 2020-02191, 2015-2558, 2010-5983, 2012-5538, 2014-6395, 349-2006-237, 2009-1039, 2018-02635, 2015-06722]
  2. Vinnova Swelife grant [2017-05284]
  3. Academy of Finland [263401, 267882, 312063, 312072, 317599]
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF18OC0034408]
  5. Scania University Hospital (ALF grant)
  6. Diabetes Wellness Sweden [25-420 PG]
  7. Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation [20180640]
  8. Swedish Diabetes Foundation [DIA2019-468, DIA2020-511]
  9. EFSD/Lilly European Diabetes Research Programme
  10. Hjelt Foundation
  11. Albert Pahlsson Research Foundation
  12. Crafoord Foundation [20180778, 20190912, 20200867, 20200828, 20200891]
  13. Ake Wiberg Foundation [M20-0214]
  14. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [IRC15-0067]
  15. Pfizer
  16. Vaasa Hospital District
  17. Jakobstadsnejden Heart Foundation
  18. Folkhalsan Research Foundation
  19. Ollqvist Foundation
  20. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  21. University of Helsinki
  22. Nordic Center of Excellence in Disease Genetics
  23. European Union [EXGENESIS FP62004-005272, MOSAIC FP7-600914]
  24. Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland
  25. Finnish Diabetes Research Foundation
  26. Foundation for Life and Health in Finland
  27. Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation
  28. Finnish Medical Society
  29. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  30. Helsinki University Hospital
  31. Perklen Foundation
  32. Narpes Health Care Foundation
  33. Ahokas Foundation
  34. Ministry of Education in Finland
  35. Municipal Heath Care Center and Hospital in Jakobstad
  36. Health Care Center in Vaasa
  37. Health Care Center in Narpes
  38. Health Care Center in Korsholm
  39. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (no. FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant [269045]
  40. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [115881]
  41. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  42. Region Skane (Scania County)
  43. ANDIS steering committee
  44. Swedish Research Council [2018-02635, 2020-02191, 2017-02688, 2015-06722] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  45. European Research Council (ERC) [269045] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  46. Academy of Finland (AKA) [312072, 317599, 317599] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genome-wide association and genetic risk score analyses reveal differences in genetic architecture among five subtypes of diabetes, with some subtypes showing unique genetic backgrounds indicating potential etiological differences.
Genome-wide association and genetic risk score analyses highlight differences in genetic architecture across five subtypes of diabetes. Type 2 diabetes has been reproducibly clustered into five subtypes with different disease progression and risk of complications; however, etiological differences are unknown. We used genome-wide association and genetic risk score (GRS) analysis to compare the underlying genetic drivers. Individuals from the Swedish ANDIS (All New Diabetics In Scania) study were compared to individuals without diabetes; the Finnish DIREVA (Diabetes register in Vasa) and Botnia studies were used for replication. We show that subtypes differ with regard to family history of diabetes and association with GRS for diabetes-related traits. The severe insulin-resistant subtype was uniquely associated with GRS for fasting insulin but not with variants in the TCF7L2 locus or GRS reflecting insulin secretion. Further, an SNP (rs10824307) near LRMDA was uniquely associated with mild obesity-related diabetes. Therefore, we conclude that the subtypes have partially distinct genetic backgrounds indicating etiological differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available