4.8 Article

Pyrenetetraone-based covalent organic framework as an effective electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages 3907-3912

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-021-4043-2

Keywords

electrocatalysis; oxygen reduction reaction; metal free; pyrenetetraone; covalent organic framework

Funding

  1. MICINN [PID2019-106268GB-C33, CTQ2017-84309-C2-1-R, RED2018-102412-T, FIS2017-82415-R]
  2. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid Transnanoavansens Program [S2018/NMT-4349]
  3. Comunidad de Madrid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel porous and crystalline two-dimensional electrochemically active covalent organic framework (COF) has been developed as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). It does not require the addition of any metal or conductive supporting material and avoids any additional carbonization step. The enhanced crystallinity and porosity of the COF network play a vital role in its superior performance.
A novel porous and crystalline two-dimensional (2D) electrochemically active covalent organic framework (COF) based on ortho-quinone units has been prepared as an innovative approach towards the development of organic cathode materials with multiple redox sites as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). In contrast with most of the previously reported COFs as electrocatalysts for the ORR, the electrocatalytic application of this material towards ORR has been investigated without adding any metal or conductive supporting material and avoiding any additional carbonization step. Additionally, the electrochemical properties of the COF material have been compared with two analogue amorphous frameworks with similar chemical composition, which points out the important role of the enhanced crystallinity and porosity of the COF network in its superior performance as an electrocatalyst towards ORR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available