4.8 Article

Operando Investigation of Locally Enhanced Electric Field Treatment (LEEFT) Harnessing Lightning-Rod Effect for Rapid Bacteria Inactivation

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 860-867

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02240

Keywords

Locally enhanced electric field treatment; Lightning-rod effect; Electroporation; Antimicrobial; Nanostructures; Operando investigation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542174, CBET 1845354]
  2. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth of undesired bacteria can be rapidly inactivated by locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT), which induces electroporation. This study provides the first visualization and mechanism elucidation of LEEFT for bacteria inactivation at the single-cell level, demonstrating its potential for future applications.
The growth of undesired bacteria causes numerous problems. Here, we show that locally enhanced electric field treatment (LEEFT) can cause rapid bacteria inactivation by electroporation. The bacteria inactivation is studied in situ at the single-cell level on a lab-on-a-chip that has nanowedge-decorated electrodes. Rapid bacteria inactivation occurs at the nanowedge tips where the electric field is enhanced due to the lightning-rod effect. Electroporation induced by the locally enhanced electric field is the predominant mechanism. The antimicrobial performance depends on the strength of the enhanced electric field instead of the applied voltage, and no generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is detected when >90% bacteria inactivation is achieved. Quick membrane pore closure under lower voltages confirms that electroporation is induced in LEEFT. This work is the first-time visualization and mechanism elucidation of LEEFT for bacteria inactivation at the single-cell level, and the findings will provide strong support for its future applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available