4.6 Article

Novel CACNA1A Variant p.Cys256Phe Disrupts Disulfide Bonds and Causes Spinocerebellar Ataxia

Journal

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 401-404

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.28835

Keywords

ataxia; autosomal dominant; missense mutation; calcium channels

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research within the Faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University [IZKF TN1-9, 532009]
  2. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [DO 2386/1-1]
  3. Erika-Cremer habilitation fellowship of the University of Innsbruck
  4. Austrian Science Fund [FWF P27809, CavX-DOC 30]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The novel C256F variant in the Cav2.1 Ca2+ channel alpha 1-subunit is found to have pathogenicity in SCA, affecting channel function and contributing to the disease phenotype.
Background Spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a progressive, autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder typically associated with CAG repeat expansions. Objective We assessed the pathogenicity of the novel, heterozygous missense variant p.Cys256Phe (C256F) in the pore-forming alpha 1-subunit of the Cav2.1 Ca2+ channel found in a 63-year-old woman with SCA with no CAG repeat expansion. Methods We examined the effect of the C256F variant on channel function using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in transfected tsA-201 cells. Results The maximum Ca2+ current density was significantly reduced in the mutant compared to wild-type, which could not be explained by lower expression levels of mutant Cav2.1 alpha 1- protein. Together with a significant increase in current inactivation, this is consistent with a loss of channel function. Molecular modeling predicted disruption of a conserved disulfide bond through the C256F variant. Conclusions Our results support the pathogenicity of the C256F variant for the SCA phenotype and provide further insight into Cav2.1 structure and function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available