4.7 Article

Radii of young star clusters in nearby galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 508, Issue 4, Pages 5935-5953

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2907

Keywords

galaxies: star clusters: general; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [1909063, PHY-1748958]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1909063] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that most galaxies share a common cluster radius distribution, with a peak around 3 pc, and high-mass clusters are more likely to expand without tidal limitations. There is a relationship between cluster radius and mass at different ages, with a noticeable scatter in cluster density distributions that seems to decrease with increasing cluster age.
We measure the projected half-light radii of young star clusters in 31 galaxies from the Legacy Extragalactic UV Survey (LEGUS). We implement a custom pipeline specifically designed to be robust against contamination, which allows us to measure radii for 6097 clusters. This is the largest sample of young star cluster radii currently available. We find that most (but not all) galaxies share a common cluster radius distribution, with the peak at around 3 pc. We find a clear mass-radius relation of the form R-eff proportional to M-0(.24). This relation is present at all cluster ages younger than 1 Gyr, but with a shallower slope for clusters younger than 10 Myr. We present simple toy models to interpret these age trends, finding that high-mass clusters are more likely to be not tidally limited and expand. We also find that most clusters in LEGUS are gravitationally bound, especially at older ages or higher masses. Lastly, we present the cluster density and surface density distributions, finding a large scatter that appears to decrease with cluster age. The youngest clusters have a typical surface density of 100 M-circle dot pc(-2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available