4.7 Article

The origin of the high-mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54/BD+532790

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 511, Issue 3, Pages 4123-4133

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac184

Keywords

stars: individual: HMXB 4U 2206+54/BD+53 2790; X-ray: binaries; stars: formation; stars: evolution; stars: neutron; stars: supernovae

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [NE 515/61-1]
  2. Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science [577/17.08.2018]
  3. Bulgarian National Science Fund [KPi-06-H28/2 08.12.2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the astrometric parameters and radial velocity data, it is proposed that the high-mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54/BD+532790 originated from a subgroup of the Cepheus OB1 association and its most massive star may have ended its evolution within approximately 7-9 million years.
Based on the Gaia EDR3 astrometric parameters and our new systemic radial velocity of the high-mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54/BD+532790, we studied the trace back motion of the system and propose that it originated in the subgroup of the Cepheus OB1 association (Age similar to 4-10 Myr) with its brightest star, BD+532820 (B0V; L similar to 10(4.7) L-circle dot). The kinematic age of 4U 2206+54 is about 2.8 +/- 0.4 Myr, it is at a distance of 3.1-3.3 kpc and has a space velocity of 75-100 km s(-1) with respect to this member star (BD+532820) of the Cep OB1 association. This runaway velocity indicates that the progenitor of the neutron star hosted by 4U 2206+54 lost about 4-9 M-circle dot during the supernova explosion and the latter one received a kick velocity of at least 200-350 km s(-1) . Since the high-mass X-ray binary 4U 2206+54/BD+532790 was born as a member of a subgroup of Cep OB1, the initially most massive star in the system terminated its evolution within less than or similar to 7-9 Myr, corresponding to an initial mass greater than or similar to 32 M-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available