4.7 Article

Pre-supernova feedback mechanisms drive the destruction of molecular clouds in nearby star-forming disc galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 509, Issue 1, Pages 272-288

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2938

Keywords

stars: formation; ISM: clouds; ISM: structure; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) through an Emmy Noether Research Group [KR4801/1-1]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [714907, 694343]
  3. DFG Sachbeihilfe [KR4801/2-1]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT180100375, DP190101258]
  5. Programme National Cosmology et Galaxies (PNCG) of the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS/INSU)
  6. INP
  7. IN2P3
  8. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA)
  9. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)
  10. Programme National Physique et Chimie du Milieu Interstellaire' (PCMI) of CNRS/INSU
  11. INC/INP - CEA
  12. DFG [SFB 881, 138713538, KR4598/2-1]
  13. German Excellence Strategy [EXC-2181/1 -390900948]
  14. National Science Foundation [1615105, 1615109, 1653300, 1903946]
  15. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [RGPIN-2017-03987]
  16. European Union [726384/EMPIRE]
  17. European Research Council via the ERC Synergy Grant ECOGAL [855130]
  18. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [PID2019-106027GA-C44]
  19. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) under ADAP [NNX16AF48G, NNX17AF39G]
  20. ALMA [2012.1.00650.S, 2015.1.00925.S, 2015.1.00956.S]
  21. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  22. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1903946] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that early feedback mechanisms play a crucial role in dispersing GMCs and limiting their star formation efficiency after the onset of star formation, with effects related to the morphological features of galaxies and independent of environmental factors. Additionally, the efficiency at which energy injected by these feedback mechanisms couples with the parent GMC is relatively low.
It is a major open question which physical processes stop gas accretion on to giant molecular clouds (GMCs) and limit the efficiency at which gas is converted into stars. While feedback from supernova explosions has been the popular feedback mechanism included in simulations of galaxy formation and evolution, 'early' feedback mechanisms such as stellar winds, photoionization, and radiation pressure are expected to play an important role in dispersing the gas after the onset of star formation. These feedback processes typically take place on small scales (similar to 10-100 pc) and their effects have therefore been difficult to constrain in environments other than the Milky Way. We apply a novel statistical method to similar to 1 arcsec resolution maps of CO and H a across a sample of nine nearby galaxies, to measure the time over which GMCs are dispersed by feedback from young, high-mass stars, as a function of the galactic environment. We find that GMCs are typically dispersed within similar to 3 Myr on average after the emergence of unembedded high-mass stars, with variations within galaxies associated with morphological features rather than radial trends. Comparison with analytical predictions demonstrates that, independently of the environment, early feedback mechanisms (particularly photoionization and stellar winds) play a crucial role in dispersing GMCs and limiting their star formation efficiency in nearby galaxies. Finally, we show that the efficiency at which the energy injected by these early feedback mechanisms couples with the parent GMC is relatively low (a few tens of per cent), such that the vast majority of momentum and energy emitted by the young stellar populations escapes the parent GMC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available