4.7 Article

Probing gravity with the DES-CMASS sample and BOSS spectroscopy

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 509, Issue 4, Pages 4982-4996

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3129

Keywords

cosmological parameters; gravitational lensing; large-scale structure of the Universe

Funding

  1. NASA [15-WFIRST150008]
  2. Simons Foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. US Department of Energy
  5. US National Science Foundation
  6. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  10. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  11. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  12. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  13. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  14. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  15. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  16. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  17. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  18. Argonne National Laboratory
  19. University of California at Santa Cruz
  20. University of Cambridge
  21. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  22. University of Chicago
  23. University College London
  24. DES-Brazil Consortium
  25. University of Edinburgh
  26. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  27. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  28. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  29. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  30. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  31. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  32. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  33. associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  34. University of Michigan
  35. NFS's NOIRLab
  36. University of Nottingham
  37. Ohio State University
  38. University of Pennsylvania
  39. University of Portsmouth
  40. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  41. Stanford University
  42. University of Sussex
  43. Texas AM University
  44. OzDES Membership Consortium
  45. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  46. MICINN [ESP2017-89838, PGC2018-094773, PGC2018-102021, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-20160597, MDM-2015-0509]
  47. ERDF funds from the European Union
  48. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  49. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) [240672, 291329, 306478]
  50. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) do e-Universo (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  51. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  52. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  53. National Science Foundation
  54. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  55. University of Arizona
  56. Brazilian Participation Group
  57. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  58. Carnegie Mellon University
  59. University of Florida
  60. French Participation Group
  61. German Participation Group
  62. Harvard University
  63. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  64. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  65. Johns Hopkins University
  66. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  67. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  68. New Mexico State University
  69. New York University
  70. Pennsylvania State University
  71. Princeton University
  72. Spanish Participation Group
  73. University of Tokyo
  74. University of Utah
  75. Vanderbilt University
  76. University of Virginia
  77. University of Washington
  78. Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper demonstrates the feasibility of using the DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) as the equivalent of CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the framework of modified gravity. By combining the data vectors of DMASS galaxies' angular clustering, DES METACALIBRATION sources' cosmic shear, and cross-correlation of the two, along with RSD measurements from the CMASS sample and Planck data, we obtain constraints on modified gravity parameters mu(0) and Sigma(0). The constraints obtained with DMASS are tighter than those with other samples using the same external data sets, indicating the effectiveness of this approach in breaking the degeneracy between galaxy bias and other cosmological parameters.
The DES-CMASS sample (DMASS) is designed to optimally combine the weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and redshift-space distortions (RSD) probed by the CMASS galaxy sample from the Baryonic Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey. In this paper, we demonstrate the feasibility of adopting DMASS as the equivalent of CMASS for a joint analysis of DES and BOSS in the framework of modified gravity. We utilize the angular clustering of the DMASS galaxies, cosmic shear of the DES METACALIBRATION sources, and cross-correlation of the two as data vectors. By jointly fitting the combination of the data with the RSD measurements from the CMASS sample and Planck data, we obtain the constraints on modified gravity parameters mu(0) = -0.37(-0.45)(+0.47) and Sigma(0) = 0.078(-0.082)(+0.078). Our constraints of modified gravity with DMASS are tighter than those with the DES Year 1 REDMAGIC sample with the same external data sets by 29 per cent for mu(0) and 21 per cent for Sigma(0), and comparable to the published results of the DES Year 1 modified gravity analysis despite this work using fewer external data sets. This improvement is mainly because the galaxy bias parameter is shared and more tightly constrained by both CMASS and DMASS, effectively breaking the degeneracy between the galaxy bias and other cosmological parameters. Such an approach to optimally combine photometric and spectroscopic surveys using a photometric sample equivalent to a spectroscopic sample can be applied to combining future surveys having a limited overlap such as DESI and LSST.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available