4.7 Article

Five young δ Scuti stars in the Pleiades seen with Kepler/K2

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 511, Issue 4, Pages 5718-5729

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac240

Keywords

asteroseismology; stars: evolution; stars: oscillations; stars: variables: delta Scuti; star clusters: individual: Pleiades

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP210103119, FT210100485]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT210100485] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mode identification was performed for five delta Scuti stars in the Pleiades star cluster using K2 photometry. The study found radial and dipole mode ridges, as well as offset modes, through echelle diagrams. Non-rotating stellar pulsation models were used to verify mode identifications, showing good agreement within the constraints of the cluster. The study also indicated potential for future investigation into asteroseismic rotation rates, masses, and ages using rotating models.
We perform mode identification for five delta Scuti stars in the Pleiades star cluster, using custom light curves from K2 photometry. By creating echelle diagrams, we identify radial and dipole mode ridges, comprising a total of 28 radial and 16 dipole modes across the five stars. We also suggest possible identities for those modes that lie offset from the radial and dipole ridges. We calculate non-rotating stellar pulsation models to verify our mode identifications, finding good agreement within the age and metallicity constraints of the cluster. We also find that for all stars, the least dense models are preferred, reflecting the lower density of these oblate, rotating stars. Three of the five stars show rotationally split multiplets. We conclude that the sample shows promise for asteroseismic rotation rates, masses, and ages with rotating models in the future. Our preliminary modelling also indicates some sensitivity to the helium abundance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available