4.7 Article

A quantitative assessment of completeness correction methods and public release of a versatile simulation code

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 509, Issue 4, Pages 5836-5857

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3265

Keywords

galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: luminosity function, mass function

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D) [CE170100013]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [JWST-ERS-1342]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Having accurate completeness functions is crucial for determining the ultraviolet luminosity functions. Different methods have been used to determine completeness functions, and it has been found that considering completeness as a function of both input and output magnitude is the most robust approach. Comparisons between mock observations and real images indicate that uncertainties in the UVLFs are predominantly influenced by small number statistics and cosmic variance.
Having accurate completeness functions is crucial to the determination of the rest-frame ultraviolet luminosity functions (UVLFs) all the way back to the epoch of reionization. Most studies use injection-recovery simulations to determine completeness functions. Although conceptually similar, published approaches have subtle but important differences in their definition of the completeness function. As a result, they implement different methods to determine the UVLFs. We discuss the advantages and limitations of existing methods using a set of mock observations, and then compare the methods when applied to the same set of Hubble Legacy Field (HLF) images. We find that the most robust method under all our mock observations is the one that defines completeness as a function of both input and output magnitude. Other methods considering completeness only as a function of either input or output magnitude may suffer limitations in a presence of photometric scatter and/or steep luminosity functions. In particular, when the flux scatter is greater than or similar to 0.2 mag, the bias in the bright end of the UVLFs is on par with other systematic effects such as the lensing magnification bias. When tested on HLF images, all methods yield UVLFs that are consistent within 2 sigma confidence, suggesting that UVLF uncertainties in the literature are still dominated by small number statistics and cosmic variance. The completeness simulation code used in this study (GLACiaR2) is publicly released with this paper as a tool to analyse future higher precision data sets such as those expected from the James Webb Space Telescope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available