4.6 Article

Disrupting the MAD2L2-Rev1 Complex Enhances Cell Death upon DNA Damage

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030636

Keywords

TLS; small molecules

Funding

  1. ASI (Ariel Scientific Innovations)
  2. Israel Cancer Association [20210048, 20221266]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemotherapy is a common treatment for cancer, but drug resistance limits its effectiveness. This study focuses on targeting the TLS pathway to improve chemotherapy and identifies two potential TLS inhibitors that sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs.
DNA-damaging chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin have been the first line of treatment for cancer for decades. While chemotherapy can be very effective, its long-term success is often reduced by intrinsic and acquired drug resistance, accompanied by chemotherapy-resistant secondary malignancies. Although the mechanisms causing drug resistance are quite distinct, they are directly connected to mutagenic translesion synthesis (TLS). The TLS pathway promotes DNA damage tolerance by supporting both replication opposite to a lesion and inaccurate single-strand gap filling. Interestingly, inhibiting TLS reduces both cisplatin resistance and secondary tumor formation. Therefore, TLS targeting is a promising strategy for improving chemotherapy. MAD2L2 (i.e., Rev7) is a central protein in TLS. It is an essential component of the TLS polymerase zeta (zeta), and it forms a regulatory complex with Rev1 polymerase. Here we present the discovery of two small molecules, c#2 and c#3, that directly bind both in vitro and in vivo to MAD2L2 and influence its activity. Both molecules sensitize lung cancer cell lines to cisplatin, disrupt the formation of the MAD2L2-Rev1 complex and increase DNA damage, hence underlining their potential as lead compounds for developing novel TLS inhibitors for improving chemotherapy treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available