4.6 Article

Protective Effects of Green Tea Supplementation against Lead-Induced Neurotoxicity in Mice

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030993

Keywords

caffeine; dyslipidemia; GC; MS; lead toxicity; neurobehavior

Funding

  1. King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP-2021/374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates that green tea supplementation can protect against lead-induced toxicity in mice by ameliorating body weight, blood glucose, blood picture, and behavioral alterations.
The use of natural products as therapeutic agents is rapidly growing recently. In the current study, we investigated the protective effects of green tea supplementation on lead-induced toxicity in mice. Forty albino mice were divided into four groups as follows: A: control group; B: green tea receiving group; C: lead-intoxicated group; and D: lead-intoxicated group supplemented with green tea. At the end of the experiment, the animals were tested for neurobehavioral and biochemical alterations. Green tea was analyzed through Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. We found that supplementation with green tea ameliorated the lead-associated increase in body weight and blood glucose. Green tea supplementation also changed the blood picture that was affected due to lead toxicity and ameliorated lead-induced dyslipidemia. The group of mice that were supplemented with green tea has shown positive alterations in locomotory, anxiety, memory, and learning behaviors. The GC/MS analysis revealed many active ingredients among which the two most abundant were caffeine and 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester. We concluded that green tea supplementation has several positive effects on the lead-induced neurotoxicity in mice and that these effects may be attributed to its main two active ingredients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available