4.6 Article

The Impact of a Graded Maximal Exercise Protocol on Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds: A Pilot Study

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020370

Keywords

exhaled breath; VOCs; exercise; metabolomics; mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. Loughborough University Graduate School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds showed dynamic changes in isoprene levels in response to exercise. Inter-individual variation and other factors may affect the results, even though differences were observed between 10 and 60 minutes post-exercise.
Exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are of interest due to their minimally invasive sampling procedure. Previous studies have investigated the impact of exercise, with evidence suggesting that breath VOCs reflect exercise-induced metabolic activity. However, these studies have yet to investigate the impact of maximal exercise to exhaustion on breath VOCs, which was the main aim of this study. Two-litre breath samples were collected onto thermal desorption tubes using a portable breath collection unit. Samples were collected pre-exercise, and at 10 and 60 min following a maximal exercise test (VO2MAX). Breath VOCs were analysed by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using a non-targeted approach. Data showed a tendency for reduced isoprene in samples at 10 min post-exercise, with a return to baseline by 60 min. However, inter-individual variation meant differences between baseline and 10 min could not be confirmed, although the 10 and 60 min timepoints were different (p = 0.041). In addition, baseline samples showed a tendency for both acetone and isoprene to be reduced in those with higher absolute VO2MAX scores (mL(O-2)/min), although with restricted statistical power. Baseline samples could not differentiate between relative VO2MAX scores (mL(O-2)/kg/min). In conclusion, these data support that isoprene levels are dynamic in response to exercise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available