4.8 Article

Parp1 promotes sleep, which enhances DNA repair in neurons

Journal

MOLECULAR CELL
Volume 81, Issue 24, Pages 4979-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.10.026

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation (ISF) [961/19]
  2. United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) [2017105]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) -BSF joint funding EDGE program (NSF-BSF) [2019604]
  4. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01 MH116470]
  5. ISF [1326/15, 51/11]
  6. Adelis Foundation
  7. European Research Council [ERC-2019-CoG 864353]
  8. Azrieli Foundation fellowship award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals that DNA damage is a homeostatic driver for sleep, with neuronal activity and mutagens triggering repair during sleep. DDR proteins show increased activity during sleep, while Parp1 promotes sleep and repair, sensing cellular pressure for sleep.
The characteristics of the sleep drivers and the mechanisms through which sleep relieves the cellular homeostatic pressure are unclear. In flies, zebrafish, mice, and humans, DNA damage levels increase during wakefulness and decrease during sleep. Here, we show that 6 h of consolidated sleep is sufficient to reduce DNA damage in the zebrafish dorsal pallium. Induction of DNA damage by neuronal activity and mutagens triggered sleep and DNA repair. The activity of the DNA damage response (DDR) proteins Rad52 and Ku80 increased during sleep, and chromosome dynamics enhanced Rad52 activity. The activity of the DDR initiator poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (Parp1) increased following sleep deprivation. In both larva zebrafish and adult mice, Parp1 promoted sleep. Inhibition of Parp1 activity reduced sleep-dependent chromosome dynamics and repair. These results demonstrate that DNA damage is a homeostatic driver for sleep, and Parp1 pathways can sense this cellular pressure and facilitate sleep and repair activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available