4.7 Article

An improved two-step saccharification of high-concentration corn starch slurries by granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 259-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.049

Keywords

Corn starch; High concentration; Granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme; Two-step saccharification

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371787]
  2. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31230057]
  3. Science and Technology Support (Agriculture) program of Jiangsu province [BE2014305]
  4. Twelfth Five-Year National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012BAD34B07]
  5. Jiangsu province Collaborative Innovation Center for Food safety and quality control industry development program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starch saccharification is a key step in the industrial production of syrups. A two-step saccharification of raw corn starch at high concentration (45%, w/w) using granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme (GSHE) was investigated to improve the efficiency of this process. The results showed that the two-step saccarification (reaction at 65 degrees C for 30 min, followed by reaction at 70 degrees C for 90 min) was more effective than a single-step saccarification involving reaction at 65 degrees C for 120 min. After saccharification, both the glucose content and dextrose equivalent (DE) value were 10% greater using the two-step saccharification than using a single-step saccharification. Assessing the mechanism indicated that the reduction in peak viscosity of the starch slurry was more obvious using the two-step saccharification, the water activity was higher, and the mobility of water was stronger. Thus, the two-step saccharification offers great advantages in the production of syrups using granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available