4.4 Article

Counting actin in contractile rings reveals novel contributions of cofilin and type II myosins to fission yeast cytokinesis

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E21-08-0376

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM026132, R15GM134496]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used low concentrations of GFP-Lifeact to investigate the amount of polymerized actin in the contractile rings of live fission yeast cells. The results showed that adf1-M3 mutant cells accumulated twice the amount of polymerized actin in their contractile rings compared to wild-type cells, along with an increase in type II myosins.
Cytokinesis by animals, fungi, and amoebas depends on actomyosin contractile rings, which are stabilized by continuous turnover of actin filaments. Remarkably little is known about the amount of polymerized actin in contractile rings, so we used low concentrations of GFP-Lifeact to count total polymerized actin molecules in the contractile rings of live fission yeast cells. Contractile rings of wild-type cells accumulated polymerized actin molecules at 4900/min to a peak number of similar to 198,000 followed by a loss of actin at 5400/min throughout ring constriction. In adf1-M3 mutant cells with cofilin that severs actin filaments poorly, contractile rings accumulated polymerized actin at twice the normal rate and eventually had almost twofold more actin along with a proportional increase in type II myosins Myo2, Myp2, and formin Cdc12. Although 30% of adf1-M3 mutant cells failed to constrict their rings fully, the rest lost actin from the rings at the wild-type rates. Mutations of type II myosins Myo2 and Myp2 reduced contractile ring actin filaments by half and slowed the rate of actin loss from the rings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available