4.7 Article

The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres for papermaking applications

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 295-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibres; Stone groundwood pulp; Lignin; Papermaking; Mechanical properties

Funding

  1. Spanish Economy and Competitiveness Ministry [CTQ2012-3686-C02-01, CTQ2013-48090-C2-2-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of cellulose nanofibres (CNF) for the enhancement of paper's mechanical properties has been reported by many authors. Concretely, the available literature is mainly focused on TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibres. However, recent industrial research projects, in which LEPAMAP group has been involved, have demonstrated that this type of nanocellulose has unaffordable production costs for the papermaking industry. In this sense, the present work aims to produce low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres (LCNF), finding some strong alternatives to TEMPO-mediated oxidation. For that, lignocellulosic nanofibres (LCNF) were produced from stone groundwood pulp (SGW) from pine after a chemical pulping process (sodium hydroxide and antraquinone). The effect of lignin content was studied and controlled through bleaching steps and quantified. It was found that high lignin content makes nanofibrillation difficult. The reinforcing effect of CNF was mechanically characterized by the addition of 3 wt% of CNF into different papermaking pulps. The results showed that it is possible to obtain low-cost LCNF that provide the same increase in mechanical properties than TEMPO-oxidized CNF when they are used for paper reinforcement. It was also found that lignin plays an important role in the obtaining of LCNF by fully mechanical treatments, where lower lignin contents expedite the nanofibrillation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available