4.7 Review

Rapid field trace detection of pesticide residue in food based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 188, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-021-05025-3

Keywords

SERS; Food residue; Pesticide; SERS substrate; Intelligent algorithm; Microfluid control

Funding

  1. Premaintenance Youth Science Funds of Zhejiang Province [LR19F050001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program project [2017YFD040800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a comprehensive report on the detection of pesticides using SERS technology, discussing the characteristics of different pesticides and the impact of substrates on detection. It highlights the progress in real sample analysis and Raman data processing methods with intelligent algorithms. Future research needs to address the challenges of rapid detection of pesticide residue in complex food matrices using SERS.
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy is an alternative detection tool for monitoring food security. However, there is still a lack of a conclusion of SERS detection with respect to pesticides and real sample analysis, and the summary of intelligent algorithms in SERS is also a blank. In this review, a comprehensive report of pesticides detection using SERS technology is given. The SERS detection characteristics of different types of pesticides and the influence of substrate on inspection are discussed and compared by the typical ways of classification. The key points, including the progress in real sample analysis and Raman data processing methods with intelligent algorithm, are highlighted. Lastly, major challenges and future research trends of SERS analysis of pesticide residue are also addressed. SERS has been proven to be a powerful technique for rapid test of residue pesticides in complex food matrices, but there still is a tremendous development space for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available