4.5 Review

Different materials of cranioplasty for patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 47, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027936

Keywords

cranial implant; cranioplasty; network meta-analysis; systematic review

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Provence [2020YFQ0009]
  2. Outstanding Subject Development 135 Project of West China Hospital, Sichuan University [ZY2016102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different cranial implants for patients with cranial defects due to various reasons through systematic review and network meta-analysis. It will include randomized controlled trials and non-randomized prospective studies, and assess the robustness of results through subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
Background: Cranioplasty is widely applied on patients who has undergone decompress craniectomy (DC) due to intractable increased intracranial pressure and the cranioplasty materials have been on the bleeding edge of biomolecular and material science. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of different cranial implants for patients with cranial defects due to various reasons. Methods and analysis: This protocol has been reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. The following electronic databases will be searched from the date of database establishment to September 1, 2020: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang. Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized prospective studies focus on cranial implants will be included. Quality assessment will be conducted using Cochrane Collaboration's tool or risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions based on their study designs. The primary outcome will be postoperative early mortality and implant failure while various complications for secondary outcomes. Pairwise and network meta-analysis will be conducted using STATA V.14 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA). Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Ethics and dissemination: This systematic review does not require an ethics approval or the need to obtain informed consent. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Protocol registration number: INPLASY 202110001.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available