4.5 Article

Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in diagnosis of early prostate cancer among men who underwent robotic transperineal prostate biopsy

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 50, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028007

Keywords

neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; transperineal prostate biopsy

Funding

  1. [2018/3201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective study evaluating the predicted value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of early prostate cancer using standardized full blood count (FBC) and histology results showed no significant difference in NLR between benign and prostate cancer groups. NLR was not found to be associated with prostate cancer or predictive of Gleason grade group and D'Amico risk stratification group. The study suggests that NLR may have a limited role in predicting early-stage prostate cancer.
To evaluate the predicted value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the diagnosis of early prostate cancer by using standardized Full blood count (FBC) performed within 4 weeks before biopsy and histology results from transperineal prostate biopsy (RTPB). Patients who underwent RTPB under general anesthesia (GA), at Urology Department, Singapore General Hospital between September 2006 and Febuary 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. NLR was calculated using full blood count (FBC) that was done as a pre-admission test before GA within 4 weeks before the biopsy. Statistical analyses were done to establish the correlation of NLR and different clinical parameters such as biopsy histology, pre-biopsy PSA, and prostate volume. A total of 652 patients who underwent RTPB for diagnostic purposes with a valid PSA level were included in this study. There was total of 409 (62.7%) benign histology and 243 (37.3%) prostate cancer. There was no significant difference in median NLR between the benign and prostate cancer group (2.00 vs 1.99; P = .29). In the subgroups analysis, there was also no significant difference of median NLR value in clinical significant cancer (defined as Gleason 3 + 4 and above) and benign histology group (NLR 2.00 vs 2.01, P = .41), as well as prostate cancer and benign group according to different pre-biopsy PSA levels: PSA (ug/l) < 4, 4 to 10, 10 to 20, and >20, respectively. (Median NLR 1.34 vs 1.76; 1.97 vs 1.97; 1.97 vs 2.18; 2.18 vs 1.98, P > .05). NLR is neither associated with prostate cancer using logestic regression model nor a strong predictor of the Gleason grade group and D'Amico risk stratification group using ordinal regression model. (P > .05) There was no statistically significant difference of NLR between the benign and prostate cancer group as a whole or in the subgroup analyses for patients who underwent robotic transperineal prostate biopsy. NLR may have a limited role in predicting early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available