4.5 Article

An empyema caused by Streptococcus constellatus in an older immunocompetent patient Case report

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 100, Issue 45, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027893

Keywords

elderly individuals; empyema; immunocompetence; Streptococcus constellatus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Empyema caused by Streptococcus constellatus is rare in patients without underlying diseases, but physicians should consider this infection in community-acquired empyema in elderly individuals and treat it promptly with pleural drainage and antibiotics to prevent complications.
Rationale: Empyema caused by Streptococcus constellatus is rare in patients without underlying diseases. However, the importance of the Streptococcus anginosus group, which consists of S constellatus, S anginosus, and Streptococcus intermedius, as causative organisms of empyema has been increasing. Patient concerns: A 78-year-old man initially presented with dyspnea and chills for 4 days. He had no medical history. Diagnosis: Chest X-ray and chest computed tomography showed a large and multiloculated pleural effusion with an air bubble on the right side. Cultivation of the pleural effusion using clone library analysis of the 16S rRNA gene revealed S constellatus positivity. Interventions: The patient was treated by drainage of the pleural effusion and intravenous ceftriaxone and clindamycin for the possibility of anaerobes, followed by 10 weeks of oral antibiotics. Outcomes: On the 11th day of admission, the thoracic drainage tube was removed. After 1 year of treatment, there were no sequelae of empyema. Lessons: Although S constellatus can cause serious infections in patients with underlying diseases and immunosuppression, physicians need to consider S constellatus infection in community-acquired empyema in elderly individuals. It should be treated with early pleural drainage and antibiotics to avoid surgical decortication and prolonged hospitalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available